NEW WEAPONS FEATURED IN HEAT OF BATTLE

GEWEHR 43
In 1941, Germany invaded the Soviet Union. On the Eastern Front,
the Germans captured many Tokarev 7.62mm SVT38s and '40s self-loading rifles.
The Tokarev rifle employed a much simpler but more effective gas-operated
mechanism than the bolt-action mechanism used in the Karabiner 98k.Taking
design aspects of the SVT38 & SVT40, the Germans designed a new weapon,
which was designated the Gewehr 43 (G43). This new semi-automatic rifle
featured a removable 10-round magazine. The G43 was a beautiful design which
was much cheaper and faster to produce than the K98. The weapon's designation
was later changed to Karabiner 43, abbreviated K43, although the weapon
really wasn't a carbine; it was envisioned to replace the Mauser Karabiner
98k as the standard infantry rifle but that never happened. Production started
in October 1943; total production of the G43 until the end of the war was
402,713.

TOKAREV SVT40
Alternate Fire: Pressing your "Fire Rate" key (key that switches
from Full-Auto to Semi-Auto) will attach/detach a bayonet. When the bayonet
is attached your melee attack will be a stab. With the bayonet off, the
melee attack will be a normal bash with the stock of the gun. The bayonet
stab does more damage than the stock hit.
During
the 1930's the Soviet army experimented with several semi-auto rifles, while
several designs were fielded in limited numbers none survived to 1940. The
problems encounted by these rifles centered on their durability, the SVT40
is an improved version of an earlier Tokarev design the SVT38. Although
the SVT40 was made more robust than the earlier weapons it was still found
to require more care than the typical Soviet soldier would give to their
weapon. In order to get the most from the weapon it was generally issued
to NCO's or carefully trained soldiers who could use their increased firepower
to good effect. It also became common to issue the SVT40 with a telescopic
sight as a snipers weapon. The ability to get a rapid second shot was seen
as an asset to snipers and generally they took better care of their weapons.
When Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 they soon encountered the
SVT40 and used any they captured as the Selbstladegewehr 259(r). Examples
sent back to Germany were studied an influenced the design of the Gewehr
43.
STEN Mk. V
With the
failure of the Sten Mk. IV, the quest to develop an SMG for airborne forces
went on. As serious concern had been expressed in the ranks about the quality,
or rather, lack of quality, of the Sten since its introduction, it was decided
to make the Sten more appealing to the troops in the field, in an effort
to inspire more confidence in the weapon. The result of this was the Mk.
V, which was clearly a product of the much-improved situation the Allies
were in by 1944. If the poor quality of the Mk. II and III hit home how
bad things were, then the Mk. V might have brought a small bit of hope that
things were getting better. The most noticeable modification was the reappearance
of woodwork in the Sten design, something not seen in quantity since the
Mk. I of 1941. A wooden stock (originally fitted with elaborate Lee Enfield
rifle brass butt-plates) and twin pistol grips were fitted. Overall quality
of workmanship had improved, with welds properly finished, and a better
overall finish. How many soldiers were convinced is not known, as the woodwork
added to the weight and bulk of the weapon, and no matter how well-made
the weapon was, the problem of poor-quality magazines causing stoppages
was certainly not solved.

M3A1
Grease Gun
The widespread use of the Thompson was due mainly to the fact that
it was the only allied submachine gun in mass production at the beginning
of WWII. It had several weaknesses; e.g. weight and control. The Sten, for
example, which was of stamped and welded metal construction and finished
with a paint-like coating, scored higher than the Thompson when such things
as simplicity, accuracy, weight and reliability were measured. The
.45 caliber M3/M3A1 were far easier to manufacture than the Thompson, and
have a number of excellent design features in addition. The low cyclical
rate of fire makes the gun easier to control than most submachine guns.
The weapon's straight line of recoil thrust also adds substantially in controlling
the gun in automatic fire. The gun's loose tolerances allow for reliable
operation even if very dirty and, with its bolt and guide rod design make
it more reliable than the Thompson under adverse conditions.
___________________________________________________
All Content in this Manual © 2004 Heat of Battle Team.
Unique Content Featured in previous, current, and future versions of Heat
of Battle is © 2004 Heat of Battle Team.
Do not use content from Heat of Battle without the explicit permission of
the authors.
You can contact us by visiting http://www.heatofbattle.net